“Dr Jekyll is a victim of his time and deserves our sympathy.” Do you agree? Essay

Dr. Henry Jekyll was born into an part along with of respectability, religion, and morality. The Victorians believed in progress, self correction and set, stern morality. Writers like Samuel Smiles wrote ab fall out self-importance Help. The Victorian age was oneness of polarisation of the lifestyle of the people. in that location were incessantly dickens kinds of people, the respectable Jekylls and the destructive and dingy Hydes. Pleasures like prostitution and gambling, were frowned on by all of utmost confederacy. Even so, more respectable people indulged in these activities in secret by night and wherefore by day take break apart in a communal denunciation of these actions. The Victorians were hideous hypocrites.Famous people oft terms(prenominal) as Dr. Banardo were biefly suspected of the 1888 Ripper murders. The Victorians had a set amicable structure. There were the middle and amphetamine classes who owned the vast majority of the countrys wealth. There w ere the lower classes who ofttimes lived in abysmal conditions, meanwhile the luxuriant people lived in luxury. Stevenson was fascinated by this polarisation, this was perhaps because his father was a strict Protestant calvinist. In his writing Stevenson highlights the extremes of ordering because this was aroundthing which was a feature of his life, he had been cognise to be a slum adventurer.Dr. Henry Jekyll held a in truth high position in Victorian society. However, he was truly a mountlious function who wanted to do exactly as he pleased. It was incredibly difficult for him to do as he liked, because of his high social status. Jekyll created Hyde to let Jekyll be a rebel without the risk of creation caught.At the separate end of the spectrum there is Mr. Utterson. He was a lawyer and very respectible, but he does non indulge in pleasures. We moot that though he enjoyed the theatre, he had not cut across the doors of one for twenty years. Mr. Utterson is a vicariou s person. In a way, Utterson is the verso of Jekyll, he constrains himself and ensures his respectibility. Jekyll, on the other hand, wants to cook everything, so he creates Hyde. One of Jekylls friends was Dr. Lanyon. He was a very ceremonious doctor, whereas Jekyll was very experimental and inventive in his profession. We light upon that Lanyon did not think much of this unscientific balderdash.There ar some object slightons where charity for Jekyll is necessitate. He fair(a) wants to do what he wants, so he creates Hyde, this makes us come up some un egocentricness because of the desperateness of his situation, but at the same time he loses some sympathy because not everyone back consume everything they want. Initially he doesnt know what the consequences of taking the drugs entrust be, he is risking death for the furtherment of science, which may let out us some sympathy. Also what he doesnt know is that it matters what state of opinion you are in when you take the drugHad I approached my discovery in a more noble spiritan holy person instead of a fiend, an immoral person comes out of the experiment. Instead of proficient using Hyde from time to time, Jekyll gets addicted to Hyde (through some fault of his own he needed slef control) and soon the transformation becomes almost fissiparous of his taking the drugs to change into Hyde. Hyde is without a surmise a marvelous person.The incident where he tramples over the small female child reinforces this. It is a demonstration of the duality of nature of cosmos where a respectable doctor can trample a small girl and not think twice. However, Hydes improper doing does not stop at this. There is the brutal murder of Sir Danvers Carew, who was an MP, so very high up in society. In Dr Jekylls full statement of the case he admits that it was Hyde who murdered Carew It was Hyde, after all, and Hyde just that was guiltyThis ease with which he accepts Hydes guilt and tries to shift the blame for this terrible act makes us know less sympathy for Jekyll, as surely he should be more than a curt upset if something that he has created can to much(prenominal) an awful thing. When he first discovers that he can change into Hyde spontaneously, he is utterly mortified I must digest stared upon it half a minuteI rushed to the mirror my blood was changed to something delicately thin and icy We may feel some sympathy for Jekyll because of this, but on the other hand, Jekyll maybe could necessitate seen whats coming and stopped using Hyde.We similarly may feel less sympathy because its not that Jekyll cant remember what Hydes been doing My two natures had retentiveness in common so maybe Jekyll should have realised that Hyde was creation too evil and tried to stop unleashing him on the world before Hyde does any undecomposed damage, as we see he does when he murders Carew. To some extent he does cumber himself, he stopped using Hyde for two months, this makes us feel a deal out more sympathy for Jekyll.When Jekyll goes into hiding after the murder of Carew he feels very penitent about the death of Carew, and this makes us feel a little sympathetic towards him. He does not, however, turn himself in immediately for devotion of the death penalty, he is rather selfish I think I was fleur-de-lis to have my better impulses thus reinforce and guarded by the terrors of the scaffold.Jekyll thinks about seek to relieve his pain by having his pleasures as himself No, it was in my own person, that i was one time more tempted to trifle with my conscience, and he does so. This makes us feel a snatch of sympathy for him, as all he wants is to be free. Later on in his full statement of the case, he says A change had come over me . It was no longer the fear of the gallows, it was the horror of being Hyde that racked me. This gives us some respect for Jekyll, it shows he is altruistic. He doesnt mind being hanged so much, more he feels that if he lets Hyde loose again he depart do even more evil. This is the spring why he turned himself in, and we have to respect him for this action.Victorian society of seemingly partially to blame for the demise of Dr. Jekyll. We see that if he had been allowed to indulge in his pleasures without being criticised and becoming a social unwanted maybe his bad side would have come out more slowly, not through the terrible deeds that Hyde does My fiend had been long caged, he came out roaring. today we tend to tolerate depraved activities. If the addictions get too bad we try and attend to those affected we dont evict them from society. I think that the incident of Jekyll was partly Jekylls fault, but mostly societys fault for not allow him be free. I do hold that Jekyll is a victim of his time and deseves out sympathy.